Location, Location, Location: Accelerometer Placement Affects Steps-Based Physical Activity Outcomes During Pregnancy and Postpartum.

As pregnancy progresses, physical changes may affect physical activity (PA) measurement validity. n = 11 pregnant women (30.1 ± 3.8 years) wore ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometers on the right hip, right ankle, and non-dominant wrist for 3-7 days during the second and third trimesters (21 and 32 weeks, respectively) and 12 weeks postpartum. Data were downloaded into 60-second epochs from which stepping cadence was calculated; repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to determine significant differences among placements. At all time points, the wrist accelerometer measured significantly more daily steps (9930-10 452 steps/d) and faster average stepping cadence (14.5-14.6 steps/min) than either the hip (4972-5944 steps/d, 7.1-8.6 steps/min) or ankle (7161-8205 steps/d, 10.3-11.9 steps/min) placement, while moderate- to vigorous-intensity activity at the wrist (1.2-1.7 min/d) was significantly less than either hip (3.0-5.9 min/d) or ankle (6.1-7.3 min/d). Steps, cadence, and counts were significantly lower for the hip than the ankle at all time points. Kappa calculated for agreement in intensity classification between the various pairwise comparisons ranged from .06 to .41, with Kappa for hip-ankle agreement (.34-.41) significantly higher than for wrist-ankle (.09-.11) or wrist-hip (.06-.16). These data indicate that wrist accelerometer placement during pregnancy likely results in over counting of PA parameters and should be used with caution.

Longitudinal changes in walking cadence across pregnancy and postpartum.

BACKGROUND: Physical activity during pregnancy has many health benefits yet few pregnant women meet US guidelines for physical activity. Traditionally, physical activity has been measured as time spent in moderate and/or vigorous intensity activity, but quantifying intensity is challenging. There is increasing interest in measuring both daily steps and stepping rate, or cadence, as an indicator of physical activity overall and intensity of that activity. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does free-living step cadence change across pregnancy (from 20 weeks to 32 weeks) and postpartum (12 weeks postpartum) when data is collected via hip-worn ActiGraph (ActiGraph Corp., Pensacola, FL) accelerometers? METHODS: A total of n = 32 pregnant women were enrolled in a longitudinal study of physical activity during pregnancy; these women wore accelerometers on their right hip for one week at 20 weeks gestation, again at 32 weeks gestation, and at 12 weeks postpartum. Data were used to determine total daily steps, time spent (min/day) in various cadence ranges, minutes spent at >100 and >130 steps/min as well as mean, median, maximum, and peak cadences. RESULTS: Pregnant women accumulated significantly fewer steps per day in the third trimester compared to second (1164 steps/day less) or postpartum (1397 steps/day less) time points. Third trimester women also spent significantly fewer minutes/day in MVPA (cadences ≥100 steps/minute; 4.1 min/day less) and had a significantly lower peak cadence (10.6 steps/min less), compared to second trimester only. SIGNIFICANCE: These data indicate that pregnant women take fewer steps and walk at slower cadences in the third trimester compared to second and to postpartum, which indicates that total PA as well as absolute intensity of PA are altered during pregnancy.

Physical Activity Device Reliability and Validity during Pregnancy and Postpartum.

Current physical activity (PA) recommendations for women experiencing a normal pregnancy reflect recent research showing numerous health benefits for mother and offspring. However, few studies have evaluated PA devices' reliability and validity during pregnancy, because anatomical and physiological changes throughout gestation could affect an instrument's accuracy. PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the reliability and validity of PA devices worn on the hip, ankle, and triceps during pregnancy and postpartum. METHODS: Thirty-three women performed six activities of daily living and one treadmill walk at approximately 21 and 32 wk of pregnancy, and 12 wk postpartum. There were two visits at each time period, 1 wk apart. Energy expenditure (oxygen consumption) was measured by using indirect calorimetry (IC; criterion measure), whereas PA was quantified by using accelerometers and pedometers placed at the right hip and ankle and left triceps. Interclass reliability and monitor validity compared with IC in relative (mL·kg·min) terms were calculated using Pearson correlation. Both multitrial and single-trial intraclass reliabilities (ICC) were estimated using ANOVA to assess monitor reliability at each time period. SEM values were calculated in relative terms for each time period. RESULTS: The reliability of the devices was moderate/strong because 66% of the Pearson correlations were between 0.6 and 1.0. Multitrial ICC values were largely in the moderate/strong range because 38% of the ICC values were between 0.6 and 0.79 and 50% were between 0.8 and 1.0. The SEM values for each device between visits ranged from 7% to 23% of the mean values. Comparison between IC and devices showed that 40% and 46% of the validity coefficients were between 0.4 and 0.59 and between 0.6 and 0.79, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PA devices show moderate/strong reliability and moderate validity for measuring PA during pregnancy and postpartum.

The Elite Athlete and Strenuous Exercise in Pregnancy.

Highly trained women continue to exercise during pregnancy, but there is little information available to guide them, and their health care providers, in how to maximize performance without jeopardizing the maternal-fetal unit. Available evidence focusing on average women who perform regular vigorous exercise suggests that this activity is helpful in preventing several maladies of pregnancy, with little to no evidence of harm. However, some studies have shown that there may be a limit to how intense an elite performer should exercise during pregnancy. Health care providers should monitor these women athletes carefully, to build trust and understanding.